Recreation & Tourism
|
||
Strategic context |
||
| 7.1 |
Structure Plan Chapter 7 covers policies for recreation and tourism in the National Park. As stated in the Environment Act 1995, one of the two purposes of the National Parks is : "promoting opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities of those areas by the public". Tourism makes a significant contribution to the local economy. In an
area such as the National Park it is essential that recreation and tourism
development is sustainable : that is, ensuring that activities or development
today do not harm those qualities which future generations would wish
to enjoy. The National Park Authority's approach to recreation and tourism
development permits only that which has particular need to use the special
qualities and resources of the National Park. It aims to maximise the
local economic benefits of recreation and tourism, and seeks to accommodate
reasonable provision of local recreation facilities for residents. More
than 22 million visitor days are spent in the National Park each year.
The number of visitors who arrive by car is a major source of concern
for the National Park Authority. Measures to deal with this and to encourage
the use of public transport are dealt with in Chapter 11 of the Local
Plan. The number, type and location of recreation and tourism developments
will also affect car use. |
|
7.2 |
Structure Plan policies for recreation
and tourism (RT1 to RT5) make it clear that: |
|
|
(i) |
development will normally be accepted where it will not
cause unacceptable environmental damage, guided by recreation and tourism
zones; |
|
(ii) |
important recreation resources will be safeguarded; |
|
(iii) |
accommodation for staying visitors will be permitted by
extension or improvement of existing accommodation, or by conversion of
traditional buildings; |
|
(iv) |
static caravans or large new caravan and camping sites
will not be permitted; |
|
(v) |
development of community recreation facilities is acceptable
in principle. |
7.3 |
Many measures to manage visitor pressure on
the countryside are dealt with without recourse to, or outside the control
of, the land-use planning system. Current policies are set out in the
National Park Plan. Management Plans for specific areas or features in
the National Park, negotiated and put into practice jointly with our partner
organisations, are a crucial part of this approach. Work continues to
find further methods to sustain the National Park's attractive features
despite increased use. The National Park Authority aims to ensure consistency
between these methods and its land use policy. |
|
7.4 |
The Planning Acts provide for control over the use or development of land or buildings. Recreation in a National Park is usually more to do with land use and activity levels than built development. However, activities once considered solely a matter for land management are increasingly seen as land uses to be controlled by the planning system or to be considered when judging proposed new uses. Recent examples include the competition between hang-gliding and climbing, shooting and walking, sail boats and landscape, or helicopter trips over quiet moorland.
|
|
Appropriate recreation development |
||
7.5 |
Structure Plan Policy RT1 states that
recreation and tourism development should relate to quiet enjoyment and
activities dependent upon the use of the natural and physical characteristics
of the area. There have been calls for further guidance in the Local Plan
to interpret the meaning of the phrase 'quiet enjoyment', one of the Park's
valued characteristics. The Structure Plan and National Park Plan
set out the background and justification for the concept, and explained
its application. Residents and visitors to the National Park can legitimately
expect that the National Park Authority will seek to protect their quiet
enjoyment of the Peak District. It follows that small-scale developments
and changes to existing facilities are often acceptable where these do
not conflict with the quiet enjoyment of the National Park. On the other
hand, activities such as off-road 4-wheel drive, motor cycle scrambling,
war games, power boating, clay pigeon shooting and mass spectator events
are often inappropriate because they cause noise, disturbance, visual
intrusion or erosion and restrict public access and enjoyment. The occasional
use of much of the Park for these pursuits does not normally require planning
permission, but proposals for their introduction on a wider and more regular
basis are properly subject to planning control . Other areas no longer
have the benefit of permitted development rights. |
|
7.6 |
Circular 12/96 on National Parks (following the 1995 Environment Act) states that "many parts of the Parks should continue to be quietly enjoyed by many people for much of the time". The Circular accepts that it will not be appropriate for all forms of recreation to take place in every part of the National Parks, but goes on to say that "Nevertheless the Government does not accept that particular activities should be excluded from throughout the Parks as a matter of principle." The Government expects that conflicts between recreation and conservation will be resolved by co-operation, careful planning and positive management strategies. Where conflicts cannot be resolved, the National Park Authority can consider the use of Article 4 directions to withdraw permitted development rights.
|
|
Recreation zones |
||
7.7 |
Structure Plan Policy RT1 includes
recreation zones amongst the criteria used in considering whether recreation
and tourism development are acceptable in the National Park. Zoning represents
a combination of landscape character, land use patterns and accessibility.
Zones are now defined in detail on the Proposals Map. Zone 3 locations
which are settlements are identified on the Proposals Map (Inset Maps)
and development will be in or on the edge of the settlement in question.
Zone 3 locations which are not settlements have been given specific boundaries. |
|
7.8 |
In some instances, recreation zones shown
diagramatically in the Structure Plan have been reconsidered in view of
Natural Zone designation, conservation and recreation objectives, public
transport access and detailed policies in the Local Plan. The most significant
changes are to Zone 3 areas, where the more intensive levels of recreational
use may be appropriate and in some cases are already happening. Four areas
shown in the Structure Plan as Zone 3 are not now considered appropriate
to be areas of major recreation and tourism activity. These areas are: |
|
|
Broomhead reservoir |
) |
these areas are quiet and relatively isolated, |
|
Upper River Dove / Hollinsclough |
) |
with poor public transport access |
|
Biggin |
- |
a relatively small village on a minor road, with poor public transport
|
|
Ilam and Fenny Bentley |
- |
small settlements with poor public transport provision. Thorpe is the
best centre to serve the Dovedale area. |
|
7.9 |
Following on from Structure Plan Policy RT1 (b) (iii),
the following guidance describes the types of activity and levels of recreation
and tourism development other than camping and caravan sites which may
be acceptable within Recreation Zones 1-3. This guidance is indicative
and is not intended to be comprehensive. Each proposal will be considered
on its merits. |
|
|
Zone 1: |
Informal, low-impact, active recreation uses acceptable with careful management,
such as hostels, farmhouse accommodation, walking, cycling and riding
routes; |
|
Zone 2: |
Informal recreation uses acceptable with careful management, such
as small car parks, picnic sites, facilities linked to walking, cycling
and riding. Consideration should be given to the re-use of existing buildings
wherever possible in preference to new build; |
|
Zone 3: |
Development associated with the more intensive levels of recreation
use, including larger car parks, information provision and visitor facilities.
|
|
It may well be that, despite a proposal being of the appropriate
type for a particular zone, it is unacceptable because of its local impact
or because it would intensify existing development or activity in the
locality beyond acceptable levels. |
|
7.10 |
Structure Plan Policy RT1 and Local Plan Policy
LR1 use the words 'small', 'modest' and 'major' in relation to the scale
of developments which may be appropriate within Recreation Zones 1-3.
The acceptability of a particular scale of proposal depends upon factors
including its form, character, location and setting. However, there is
a great variety of landscapes within the National Park, which can absorb
or accommodate development in different ways. For example, a development
which would unacceptably dominate an open limestone plateau may be acceptable
within a woodland setting. Thus it is not considered realistic or necessary
to set size limits in relation to each zone because the different types
of landscape are spread throughout the National Park. |
|
7.11 |
Policy LR1 does not apply to camping and caravan development
which is covered in Policy LR3. |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.12 |
Structure Plan Policies RT1 and RT2 aim to safeguard
and improve community recreation sites such as playing fields, sports
halls and swimming pools as well as important recreation resources including
climbing crags, caving systems and watersports opportunities. Public access
to these sites will be sought and maintained wherever possible, bearing
in mind the needs of the elderly and those with a mobility difficulty
where appropriate. A list of important recreation resources such as climbing
crags and cave systems will be compiled as Supplementary Planning Guidance
to help with the implementation of Policy RT2. |
|
|
|
|
7.13 |
Camping and caravanning are the most popular types of
accommodation for visitors staying in the National Park. Considerable
provision already exists for touring caravans and tents within the National
Park. The Structure Plan enables some new developments and improvements
to existing sites to go ahead. Structure Plan Policy RT4 rejects
large caravan sites and static caravans, but allows small sites in appropriate
locations. It does not define what is meant in terms of numbers of pitches.
Much of the landscape is very open. The valleys and dales are often narrow,
ecologically sensitive, may have poor accessibility and pressure of day
visitor use. Many roads are steep, narrow and poorly aligned. If location,
access, landscape setting, and other impacts are satisfactory, new sites
may be acceptable. Appropriate size will vary from case to case, but development
or activity should in no circumstance dominate its surroundings. Site
licences set limits in multiples of 15 pitches. For guidance, sites up
to 30 pitches are capable of being more easily assimilated, although this
may be too large in many circumstances. |
7.14 |
Further Local Plan policy is needed to clarify two issues.
Firstly, the provision of facilities (including shops, restaurants, sports
and leisure facilities) on camping and caravan sites should only be permitted
when there will be no significant adverse effect on the vitality and viability
of existing facilities in surrounding communities. Secondly, dwellings
for occupation by site wardens for supervision at camping and caravan
sites should not be permitted, since in accordance with Structure Plan
Policy RT4, sites must be close to existing farmsteads. This will
enable supervision without the construction of new dwellings. |
|
||||||||
|
7.15 |
As stated in Structure Plan Policy RT4, static
caravan sites are not considered appropriate in the National Park. However,
there are existing static caravan sites in the National Park which could
be improved by landscaping or colouring of caravans. Wherever possible
through negotiation or agreement, the National Park Authority will seek
to enhance existing static sites by landscaping and colouring of caravans
appropriate to the landscape setting. A range of approved colours will
be published as Supplementary Planning Guidance. In current budgets, it
is not an economic option to consider compensation for stopping the use. |
7.16 |
Chalet developments are considered inappropriate in the
National Park because their materials, form, size and regular placing
on a site are extremely difficult to blend satisfactorily into the landscape.
Accommodation of a similar standard can be provided by other means more
acceptable in the National Park. Sites for travellers and gypsies are
dealt with in paragraph 4.51 and policy LH7 in the Housing Chapter. |
|
|
|
|
7.17 |
Camping and caravan sites and self-catering holiday accommodation
sometimes have conditions placed upon their planning approval limiting
them to seasonal occupancy. In view of the concensus that attempts should
be made to lengthen the holiday season to benefit the local economy and
provide more full-time employment, applications to relax these seasonal
occupancy conditions will be considered on their merits. However, consideration
needs to be given to the benefits to landscape, wildlife and local residents
of a period of closure and respite from tourist pressure. Particularly
when considering applications for camping and caravan sites, visibility
in the winter months and the impact on conservation features, need to
be carefully assessed. These considerations can be dealt with by the use
of planning conditions and/or agreements limiting occupancy to holiday
accommodation and preventing full-time use. The National Park Authority
defines holiday use as occupation for no more than 28 days per calendar
year by any one person. |
7.18 |
Within Local Plan Settlements, the conversion of a traditional
building to a house may be equally acceptable as use for holiday accommodation.
There may be some situations where properties made available for holiday
accommodation are unsuitable as full-time residences because of poor outdoor
or indoor living space or their relationship with adjoining dwellings.
However, unless there are specific reasons for limiting such conversions
to holiday use, holiday occupancy conditions need not be applied. |
|
||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
7.19 |
The network of public rights of way provides a valuable resource for both visitors and local residents. It requires maintenance and protection from development. This issue is dealt with in Chapter 11: Transport (paragraph 11.82 and Policy LT20).
|
Facilities for keeping and riding horses |
|
7.20 |
Horseriding is an appropriate activity as part of the
quiet enjoyment of the National Park. Planning permission is not normally
required for the use of land for grazing horses, but stables, exercise
rings and the recreational use of land usually do require permission.
The scale of use can vary from individual stabling associated with residential
use of a property, to large scale commercial livery, riding school or
pony trekking establishments. Any of these developments can have significant
impact individually or cumulatively over time on the landscape and character
of the National Park. The impact may be lessened by siting stables or
facilities adjacent to existing groups of buildings, by using local stone
and roofing materials, and through detailed design which reflects the
local building tradition. Consideration should also be given to issues
such as the ease of access to an adequate local bridleway network, likely
traffic generation, and possible nuisance to local residents, landowners
or farmers. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|

