Bakewell
|
||
Strategic context |
||
| 12.1 |
Bakewell is the largest settlement within
the National Park, and acts as a service centre for a wide rural area.
It is important that the town retains this status. Policy GS2
in the Structure Plan explains the general strategy for development
in Bakewell. The policy states that the National Park Authority will have
particular regard to the town's importance as the major centre in the
National Park and will make appropriate (and possibly exceptional) provision
in the Local Plan to facilitate a new livestock market, a relief road
and town centre redevelopment. The livestock market was relocated and
its former town centre sites redeveloped during 1998/99. |
|
12.2 |
Other policies in the Structure Plan are likely to be relevant when considering development in Bakewell, particularly policies for development in towns and villages, Conservation Areas and for listed and historic buildings (C3, C4, C8); housing, shops and community services (HC1 to HC3, SC1, SC2); economy (E1 to E4); recreation and tourism (RT1 to RT4); and new road schemes, traffic management and parking (T5 and T8).
|
|
Development Boundary
|
||
12.3 |
Bakewell is subject to greater development
pressure than elsewhere in the National Park. The development of housing
estates since 1950 significantly altered the appearance and size of the
town. Policies in the 1982 Local Plan aimed to slow this growth, and have
generally been successful. The rapid and widespread development of Bakewell
is not appropriate to its location in a National Park, to the character
of the town, or to the present level of services. The surrounding topography
limits the availability of sites which can be developed without significantly
affecting its character and setting. A Development Boundary has therefore
been defined (see Proposals Map), which shows the limit which the National
Park Authority wishes to place on development in and around Bakewell.
The National Park Authority is not prepared to allow encroachment beyond
this boundary, other than in exceptional circumstances. |
|
12.4 |
The Development Boundary has been drawn to
include: |
|
|
(i) |
most existing development including gardens; |
|
(ii) |
land with current planning permission; |
|
(iii) |
land which would be acceptable for infill development.
|
|
The Development Boundary is not intended to
encompass all existing built development in and around Bakewell. Developments
on the fringe of town which are essentially seen as individual buildings
in the landscape, are not included within the Development Boundary. |
|
12.5 |
Within the Development Boundary, the National
Park Authority wishes to allow for development which meets the social
and economic needs of the community in ways that positively contribute
to environmental conservation objectives. Structure Plan Policy C3
requires development to respect, not adversely affect, and where possible
enhance the valued characteristics of the area including important open
spaces and the wider landscape setting. The scale, siting, landscaping
and building materials must be appropriate and design must be to a high
standard (see Policy LC4). |
|
12.6 |
Outside the Development Boundary and in areas not allocated for other development in this Local Plan, Structure Plan Policy C2 applies. This restricts development to that necessary for agriculture, forestry, farm diversification, recreation and tourism or minerals, where it is compatible with all Development Plan policies. |
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
The Bakewell Conservation Area was designated in 1980. Its boundary was drawn to include important tree groups and open skyline areas which provide a green backdrop in outward views from the centre. Conservation Area status gives the National Park Authority added control over the demolition of most buildings, walls and other structures, the felling of trees, discourages 'outline' applications and requires wider publicity for planning applications, and gives priority for public investment. Structure Plan Policy C4 restricts development in Conservation Areas to that which preserves and where possible enhances the valued characteristics of the area. Local Plan policy for Conservation Areas is set out in Policy LC5. As stated in the Bakewell Conservation Area Report (1979):
The report includes a list of proposed improvements, some of which have been implemented. The National Park Authority wishes to see continuing improvement to the historic core of Bakewell. Of the remaining items on the list, some will only be possible if there is a significant reduction in the flow or speed of traffic through the town, which might best be achieved by construction of a relief road (see paragraph 12.10 and Policy LT4).
|
Important open spaces |
|
|
12.8 |
Structure Plan Policy C3 protects important open spaces and the wider landscape setting. Bakewell owes much of its character to the encircling fields and wooded areas, some of which come close to the town centre, and separate the historic core from later development. The National Park Authority is concerned to maintain this relationship, which is attractive both in terms of views out from the centre into surrounding countryside, and the close proximity of open spaces. These open spaces within the Development Boundary will be protected from development. Their designation as Important Open Spaces does not mean that public access will automatically be permitted where it is not currently available. Under Policy LC5, open spaces identified in Conservation Area analyses will also be a factor taken into account in considering development applications. |
|
|
|
|
12.8 |
It is essential to ensure that new developments produce the best public benefit, do not spoil their settings, and avoid adverse effects upon the environment or upon neighbouring uses. In order to guide prospective developers, planning briefs have been, or will be prepared and adopted by the National Park Authority for each site in Bakewell for which a proposal is made in the Local Plan. These planning briefs have the status of Supplementary Planning Guidance and may include advice on land uses, layout, design, heritage considerations, landscaping, lighting, access and car parking.
|
Relief road
|
|
12.9 |
Traffic is one of the most fundamental issues in Bakewell,
since the problems and possible solutions have implications for almost
all other development, conservation and enhancement. Since the 1930s there
have been proposals to remove through traffic from the town centre. Although
some traffic and other improvements could be made without a relief road,
the National Park Authority still considers a new relief road to be necessary
before problems of parking and pedestrian movement can be properly addressed
and to enable a full enhancement programme. |
12.10 |
Structure Plan Policy T5 safeguards land for an A6-A619-A6 Bakewell relief road. As described in the Transport chapter of the Local Plan (paragraph 11.29), it is neither realistic nor appropriate to propose a relief road to trunk or principal road standard. However, the relocation of the livestock market includes construction of a new unadopted access road from the A6 (Haddon Road). This could offer the opportunity to form a low speed relief road if it were upgraded and extended to link with the A619 near Bakewell Bridge. Land will be safeguarded by the National Park Authority (see paragraph 11.31 and Policy LT4). Further relief from traffic pressure in the town could be achieved if traffic could be signed or regulated to use the route from A6 South to A6 North via the new road, Hassop roundabout and Ashford by-pass.
|
Traffic management
|
|
12.11 |
A safer, more pleasant town centre for people on foot and with a mobility difficulty is desirable. To achieve this may involve pedestrianisation, pedestrian domination, and footway widening, whilst still allowing for access by service vehicles and orange badge holders. Redevelopment of the existing livestock market sites offers further opportunities for enhancing the pedestrian environment. The provision of better pedestrian access across the river from Baslow Road/Castle Hill will be investigated. If the relief road from A6 to A619 was constructed and traffic was diverted out of the town centre, more improvements for pedestrians could be made. In conjunction with the highway authorities and the District Council, the National Park Authority will examine those areas not affected by the town centre redevelopment and seek further ways in which the traffic issues of the town can be addressed and the Conservation Area enhanced. |
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
12.12 |
Bakewell has a problem with demand for car parking at
busy times. If no upper limit is prescribed, then it is likely
that visitor numbers will eventually prove to be far greater than the
town can comfortably accommodate. This approach is encouraged by Planning
Policy Guidance Note 13. Based upon surveys and local judgement, it is
considered that an upper limit in the order of 2000 spaces is appropriate
to meet future needs without causing undue overcrowding problems. The
total number is divided between short-stay town centre spaces and long-stay
provision east of the river. Redevelopment of the former livestock market
sites in the town centre has enabled on- and off-street short-stay parking
to be rationalised. |
12.13 |
The parking of touring coaches in the town centre causes
congestion and obstructs scheduled bus services. In the short term, provision
will be made for coaches to park east of the river as part of the livestock
market proposals, although the long-term intention is for coaches to be
accommodated closer to the town centre. |
12.14 |
Residents' car parking is a problem in parts of Bakewell, particularly in the historic core of the town, where narrow streets and small gardens lead to competition for on-street parking spaces. The National Park Authority will encourage the Highway Authority to implement residents' parking schemes where appropriate to help solve these problems (see Structure Plan Policy T8). |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
12.15 |
Structure Plan Policy T6 safeguards the route of
the Matlock-Buxton railway line which passes through Bakewell, and supports
its reinstatement. The re-opening of the railway with a station at Bakewell
is acceptable in principle (see Policy LT3). |
12.16 |
Bakewell is well served by bus routes, but the effectiveness of these services is jeopardised on market days and other peak visitor days, by the pressure of car traffic. Traffic management proposals arising from the possible construction of a new relief road may allow for priority to be given to public transport. Buses will continue to be allowed into the town centre. The bus passenger should not be placed at a disadvantage in access terms, relative to the private car user. Improved waiting facilities for passengers are desirable at the central area bus stops. (See also paragraphs 11.33 to 11.36). Coach parking is dealt with in paragraph 12.13 and Policy LB4. |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12.17 |
The provision of housing which local people on low or
moderate incomes can afford is a prominent issue in Bakewell. The Structure
Plan addresses this issue and aims to ensure the provision of an appropriate
amount of low-cost housing of a suitable type to meet this local need
and other special needs. (See Chapter 4 of this Local Plan for detailed
housing policies). The Local Plan does not identify specific sites for
these types of housing. |
12.18 |
Structure Plan Policy GS2 allows for limited exceptions
to be made to normal Structure Plan policies in Bakewell, in order to
facilitate a new livestock market, a relief road and town centre redevelopment.
Under this policy, some general needs housing has been given planning
permission as part of the livestock market relocation site and the town
centre redevelopment. This is an exception to Structure Plan Policies
HC1, HC2 and HC3, allowed by Structure Plan Policy GS2.
There is no provision for any further new build general needs housing
in Bakewell. |
12.19 |
For the avoidance of doubt, the District Council and the
National Park Authority are satisfied that adequate local needs housing
provision is being made under Structure Plan Policies HC1-HC3 including
at least two sites in Bakewell. |
12.20 |
In addition there is town centre property with vacant or underused upper floors which could be returned to housing. This could relieve pressure on other sites and help maintain existing buildings. Continued support will be given to the District Council, Housing Associations and other agencies to provide housing for sale or rent by securing full use of upper floors and other property in the town (see Policy LS2).
|
Sites for employment development
|
|
12.21 |
Structure Plan Policy E1 allows development which
provides for employment in towns and villages in the National Park, provided
that it is of a scale and type which is clearly intended to meet local
needs. Structure Plan Policy E2 states that the Local Plan will
make "strictly limited provision" for small scale industrial
development in Bakewell and the Hope Valley. Processes falling within
Use Classes B1 (Business) and B2 (General Industry) are appropriate. Other
processes are more difficult to accommodate in a sensitive rural environment
such as Bakewell, because of both the design and layout of sites/buildings
and the impact on neighbouring uses. Developments in recent years have
increased and upgraded business/office provision in upper floors in the
town centre and by conversion of the Rutland Works. |
12.22 |
Some 1.6 hectares of land south of the A6 (Ashford Road)
was used as a tip for many years. Because of land instability and the
need for access off the Trunk road, development will be expensive. However,
the National Park Authority believes that it is desirable to press for
economic development which will also improve the appearance of the site
which is on one of the main roads into Bakewell. The rear of the site
may be appropriate for relocation of uses from the town centre under Policy
LB8. |
12.23 |
Some 0.75 hectares of land adjacent to the River Wye north
of the A6 is suitable for industrial development. Because of its low level,
it could most readily be used as an extension to Cintride's existing factory,
but there is no insuperable problem to prevent separate development. |
12.24 |
Interest has been shown in the past in the development of sites for high-technology industries within Bakewell. Under the Use Classes Order, Class B1 covers office uses, research and development, and industrial processes which can be carried out in any residential area. These are generally clean, modern, electronic or computer-based industries, which are by nature 'footloose' and do not depend on local resources. They often seek attractive 'prestige' locations. The National Park Authority wishes to encourage high quality employment consistent with a National Park setting and to help retain young people. At least part of each of the two sites allocated in Policy LB6 is of sufficient quality to be suitable for such uses, and planning briefs or planning applications should indicate how parts of the sites might be segregated for B1 and high-technology uses. |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
12.25 |
Approximately half of the site and premises at Lumford Mill is currently vacant, and other buildings are in need of replacement. Planning permission has been granted for a new bridge and access further west adjoining Cintride. Subject to this provision and satisfactory consideration of design, layout and neighbourliness, a site of some 5 hectares is suitable for comprehensive redevelopment, predominantly industry/business (Use Classes B1 and B2). There is potential for conversion of the existing listed mill building to general market housing or tourist accommodation, and limited affordable housing to meet a local need, close to the existing houses. The site includes a Listed Building adjoining the existing access to Buxton Road, and adjoins the mill stream and former mill pond which is a Scheduled Ancient Monument. Both of these must be adequately safeguarded in any redevelopment. Replacement floorspace would be acceptable under Structure Plan Policy E4. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
12.26 |
In view of the limited number of sites suitable for employment uses, it is important to ensure that existing sites remain in such a use where the activity causes no problems. Structure Plan Policy E4 safeguards existing suitable industrial land and buildings or business premises. However, within the built-up area of Bakewell there are several small businesses operating which are not entirely appropriate to their surroundings, because of their visual intrusion or the noise or traffic they generate. These 'non-conforming' uses may provide important services to the local community, which the National Park Authority wishes to see retained within Bakewell. The National Park Authority will attempt where possible to encourage such businesses to relocate to more suitable sites within Bakewell, and to find more appropriate uses for their present sites. |
|
|
|
|
12.27 |
Structure Plan Policy SC1 aims to safeguard and improve shopping facilities in towns and villages, and retail development will not normally be permitted outside them. In a settlement the size of Bakewell, the development of shopping facilities away from the central area may jeopardise the continued success of existing shops and other central area businesses. Therefore, it is considered that a boundary should be drawn within which shopping uses will be concentrated, in order to consolidate and strengthen the town centre. Exceptions should only be made for small 'corner shops' serving residential areas, or for limited retail use in industrial/business areas (see policy LE5). |
|
|
|
|
12.28 |
The stall market supports and is supported by the livestock market. It is an essential element of the function and character of Bakewell as a market town. It is also a great attraction for visitors and hence supports local shops and services. Consequent upon the relocation of the livestock market, the stall market has been consolidated on the extended market square and off Granby Road. This provides the same total amount of space as before, but allows a better arrangement of stalls. Where traffic management, parking provision and the convenience of town centre users allows, stalls may be acceptable in other suitable spaces in the central shopping area. |
|
|
|
|
12.29 |
Structure Plan Policy C2 is sympathetic to proposals
to develop and improve community services. The National Park Authority
is keen to see a range of attractive and high quality facilities in Bakewell.
In order to maximise their accessibility, these should be located close
to the town centre, although there may be a case for consolidation of
existing facilities at Lady Manners School to enable multiple use by schoolchildren,
the community, and visitors. Public art and provision for performing arts
will be encouraged in the central shopping area. |
12.30 |
The network of local footpaths plays an important part in the social life and leisure activities of the town, particularly those towards or alongside the river. Policy LT20 deals with the relationship between development proposals and public rights of way. In conjunction with Policy LT21, walking routes will be investigated to provide a continuous route along the river valley avoiding stretches of the A6 road. |
|
|
|

